Gas assisted injection molding with controlled internal melt pressure

ABSTRACT

A method is provided for gas-assisted injection molding for forming a hollow product. The mold cavity is prepressurized with fluid prior to injecting the molten material into the mold cavity, and the molten material is injected into the mold cavity against the pressurized fluid to establish a resultant internal counterpressure within the molten material. A pressurized assist-gas is injected into the molten material to form a gas bubble within the molten material. The injection of molten material into the cavity is then controlled in a manner to maintain the internal counterpressure at desired levels to overcome stress forces and to control formation and movement of the bubble within the melt.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This patent application is a divisional of U.S. Ser. No. 08/784,986, filed Jan. 17, 1997 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,019,918, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Ser. No. 08/783,613, filed Jan. 14, 1997 now U.S. Pat. No. 5,863,487, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Ser. No. 08/654,622, filed May 29, 1996 now U.S. Pat. No. 5,716,561, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Ser. No. 08/515,522, filed Aug. 15, 1995 now U.S. Pat. No. 5,662,841, which is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 08/236,471, filed May 2, 1994 now U.S. Pat. No. 5,441,680.

TECHNICAL FIELD

This invention relates to injection molding and more particularly to a method and apparatus which uses stress and flow calculations and closed loop control to monitor and maintain optimum melt pressure of a molten material as it is processed by an injection apparatus.

BACKGROUND ART

When molten plastic is processed by an injection molding machine, the plastic enters a mold cavity where it is cooled to form a desired part shape. As the cooling occurs, the plastic contracts within the cavity. As a result of this contraction, the part actually shrinks in size, and sink marks or low spots often occur on the surface of the part. Shrink and sink marks have caused major problems for injection molders since injection molding was first developed. Several methods have been developed in an attempt to eliminate these problems. Some examples include gas-assisted injection molding, structural foam molding, liquid gas assisted molding, etc. In addition, foaming agents have been used in the molding process for mixing with molten plastic in order to generate inert gases in the plastic. These gases provide internal pressure in the plastic which enables the plastic to more fully fill the cavity of the mold and packs the plastic against the cavity walls. This, in turn, helps reduce sink on the surface of the plastic parts. Also, gas counterpressure in the mold cavity has been used to improve surface smoothness of molded parts.

These prior art methods are all problematic due to the large number of variables in the molding process. Varying injection pressures and injection speeds, varying melt pressures and temperatures, varying cavity conditions, and uncontrolled venting of gases all contribute to an unstable molding environment. These various problems in the molding process create burning and scission of polymer chains and create internal stresses within the plastic which remain in the plastic as the plastic material cools in the cavity. These internal stresses cause shrink, sink, and warpage of the plastic part to be molded. In addition, these various molding problems lead to degradation of the plastic material as it is processed through an injection molding machine. In general, erratic variations in pressure, temperature, and injection speed create material break-down and cause internal problems in the plastic which show up in the final molded product.

Another disadvantage of prior art systems is that the plastic melt flow in these systems experiences changes in pressure due to changes in cavity geometry as the molten plastic moves into the cavity of the mold. These pressure changes cause certain areas of the cavity to be filled more quickly than other areas resulting in different cooling characteristics in different areas of the cavity. These cooling variations cause inconsistencies in the direction of plastic solidification, which results in surface stresses, weld lines, or sink.

Gas assisted injection molding is a process for forming a hollow part in which a pressurized assist gas is injected into the molten material either in the nozzle or within the mold cavity. The assist gas forms a hollow bubble within the part which reduces the part weight, thereby reducing material costs. A major problem with this process is that it is very difficult to control the movement of the bubble within the molten plastic in the cavity. Therefore, the hollow part often has walls of uneven thickness.

U.S. Pat. No. 5,558,824 attempted to solve the problem of bubble movement within the mold cavity by prepressurizing the mold cavity with an inert gas, and controlling the release of the gas from the cavity to prevent blow out of the bubble from the interior of the molten plastic. It provides pressure sensors for sensing the pressure of the gas in the mold cavity and the pressure of the gas injected into the bubble.

The primary problem with the disclosure provided in the '824 patent is that there is no means provided for controlling the pressures acting on the bubble, and therefore bubble formation and movement cannot be controlled. Using this process, Mr. Shah will be unable to control the bubble because it is too difficult to respond in real time by altering the pressures in the cavity and within the bubble by means of valves outside the mold cavity and pressurized gas sources. Furthermore, gas is too compressible to provide the capability of controlling the melt pressure of the molten material in the cavity during injection in real time. Using this system, one cannot recognize mold cavity resistance or resistance from partial solidification, and therefore cannot respond accordingly and control the growth of the bubble. For instance, if the molten material is injected through a very thin area in the cavity, the mold cavity resistance increases, and an increase in bubble pressure will be sensed, but the source of this bubble pressure will not be known, and no means are provided for responding, other than by altering the discharge rate of gas from the cavity, which will be ineffective.

FIGS. 15a-c illustrate the flow of a typical gas assisted melt front through a mold cavity in accordance with the prior art. The melt M includes an assist gas bubble B therein. As the melt front reaches the cavity flow restriction R, as illustrated at FIG. 15b, this flow restriction will cause an increase in the pressure of the melt, which will pressurize the bubble, and will often cause the bubble to blow through the forward surface of the melt front, which would result in a scrapped part. If the melt front were to flow past the restriction, the bubble B will likely move closely adjacent the corner of the restriction R, thus resulting in a very thin section T to be formed in the final part as molded. This thin section greatly reduces the structural integrity of the final part as molded. Also, the material M may become thin at the forward edge of the melt front, and the bubble may blow through this thin portion at any time.

It is desirable to use a balanced injection molding process in which the pressure of the molten plastic is continuously controlled as the plastic moves through the injection molding machine. It is further desirable for an injection molding process to balance pressures acting upon the molten material in order to eliminate the above referenced problems caused by variations in polymer chain conditions so as to reduce internal stresses in the plastic. The ultimate goal of such an injection molding process is to produce a final product which nearly perfectly matches the cavity surface of the mold, is fully relieved of internal stresses which lead to shrink, sink, and warpage, and has greatly improved mechanical properties. In addition, part weight may be reduced, which will provide significant material savings to the manufacturers of such products.

DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION

This invention stems from the realization that, when injecting molten material into a mold cavity, it is desirable to preload the system with pressure, which provides conditions under which pressure changes become measurable, and controllable pressure differences may be established between the pressure of gas in the mold cavity and the pressure of the molten material. By providing real time closed loop control, the gas pressure and static melt pressure of the molten material may be sensed and mathematically monitored by the controller in order to provide optimal pressure conditions for injection and solidification of the molten material into the mold cavity. This closed loop pressure control on the basis of pressure differences created from preprogrammed transition of a preloaded melt into a mold cavity provides the capability to control the internal static pressure of the melt throughout the injection and solidification cycle and to provide optimal injection and solidification pressure conditions for the melt as the melt moves from the melt holder and solidifies within the mold cavity.

A method of injection molding is provided for use with an injection molding machine, comprising: (a) generating internal counterpressure within molten plastic as plastic pallets are plasticized in the injection molding machine; and (b) pressurizing air within a cavity of a mold in the injection molding machine to an air pressure level which is substantially equal to the internal counterpressure in order to counterbalance the internal counterpressure as the molten plastic is injected into the cavity, thus providing a substantially pressure-balanced molding environment for the plastic.

Also provided is a method of reducing internal stresses in plastic parts formed in a mold cavity from molten plastic injected into the mold cavity by an injection molding apparatus. The method comprises: (a) pressuring the cavity to a predetermined air pressure; (b) operating the injection molding apparatus to develop molten plastic at a first melt pressure equal to the predetermined air pressure; (c) communicating the molten plastic with the mold cavity when the predetermined air pressure and first melt pressure become equal; and (d) subsequently increasing the melt pressure to a second melt pressure, and maintaining a substantially constant difference between the air pressure in the mold cavity and the second melt pressure during a substantial portion of a predetermined period of time in which the molten plastic is being injected into the mold cavity, whereby to optimize pressure conditions acting upon the molten plastic in a manner to reduce internal stresses in the plastic parts being formed.

The present invention also contemplates a method of injection molding for use with an injection molding machine including a mold with a cavity formed therein for receiving molten plastic and a hydraulic unit for creating an injection pressure to fill the mold cavity with molten plastic at a predetermined melt pressure. The method comprises: (a) supplying air to the cavity at a predetermined air pressure; (b) sensing the melt pressure during injection; (c) sensing the air pressure in the cavity during injection; and (d) providing a closed loop controller to monitor the sensed melt pressure and sensed air pressure and to produce signals to the hydraulic unit for maintaining the melt pressure at desired levels.

The present invention further provides a method of injection molding for use with an injection molding machine including a mold therein. The method comprises: (a) determining a maximum stress to be experienced by plastic as the plastic is processed in the mold; (b) generating counterpressure within the plastic prior to injection of the plastic into the mold, the counterpressure being substantially equal to the determined maximum stress; and (c) maintaining the counterpressure within the plastic at least equal to the determined maximum stress as the plastic is injected into the mold.

The present invention further contemplates a method of reducing internal stresses in plastic parts formed in a mold cavity from molten plastic injected into the mold cavity. The method comprises: (a) pressuring the cavity to a predetermined air pressure; (b) pressuring the melt to a first pressure equal to the predetermined air pressure; (c) communicating the molten plastic to the cavity when the pressures become equal; and (d) subsequently increasing the melt pressure to a second pressure for injection.

Also provided for use with an injection molding machine is a method of injection molding, comprising: (a) calculating a maximum stress to be experienced by a shot of plastic to be molded in the injection molding machine, the stress being a result of a volumetric shrink occurring as the plastic is cooled in a cavity of a mold in the machine; (b) pressurizing a shot of plastic to a first melt pressure as the plastic is plasticized in a barrel of the injection molding machine, the first melt pressure being substantially equal to the calculated maximum stress; (c) pressurizing air within the cavity to an air pressure substantially equal to the first melt pressure; (d) commencing injection of the shot of plastic into the cavity in a laminar flow manner, wherein molten plastic flows into said cavity concentrically with respect to a point at which plastic enters the cavity; (e) increasing the melt pressure on the shot of plastic to a second melt pressure, while maintaining the air pressure within the cavity substantially constant, and maintaining a substantially constant difference between the air pressure within the cavity and the second melt pressure during a substantial portion of a period of time which the shot of plastic is being injected into the cavity; (f) sensing the first and second melt pressures and generating feedback signals indicative thereof; (g) receiving said feedback signals, comparing said feedback signals to reference values, and producing signals for controlling said first and second melt pressures; and (h) returning to step (b).

Further provided is a mold for use in an injection molding machine, comprising a front half and a back half of the mold. The front half includes an aperture formed therethrough for receiving molten plastic from the injection molding machine. The front half and back half cooperate to form a cavity therebetween, and the cavity is in fluid flow communication with the aperture to receive molten plastic therefrom. A plurality of vents are formed in one of the back half and front half, the vents having first and second ends thereof. The first end of each of the plurality of vents is in fluid flow communication with the cavity. The vents are configured according to the following formula to maintain a substantially constant air pressure in the cavity as the cavity is being filled with plastic: A=0.24241*W*T1/(C*P1), where A is a cross-sectional area of a vent, W is discharge of pressurized air through the vent in pounds per second, C is a coefficient of flow, P1 is the air pressure in the cavity in pounds per square inch, and T1 is a temperature in the cavity in degrees Fahrenheit. A channel is formed in one of the back half and the front half, the channel being in fluid flow communication with the second end of each of the plurality of vents for transferring pressurized air into and out of the cavity through the vents. A pair of valves are provided in selective fluid flow communication with the channel. One of the pair of valves is adapted to selectively receive pressurized air from a pneumatic line to provide pressurized air to the channel, and the other of the pair of valves is adapted to selectively allow discharge of pressurized air from the channel. A seal is circumscribed around the cavity and positioned between the front half and back half to prevent discharge of pressurized air from the cavity between the front half and the back half of the mold as the cavity is being filled with molten plastic.

The present invention also provides a method of injection molding non-mixable materials, and a product formed thereby. By “non-mixable” materials, it is meant that the materials are not more than partially soluble within each other and retain their substantial identity when mixed, and the materials do not chemically degrade or decompose each other. By using the methods described above and below, by building a substantial static pressure or internal counterpressure within the molten material (i.e. the mixture of non-mixable materials), the materials will substantially separate and solidify in accordance with their respective modulus. Typically, the material with the highest modulus will begin to solidify first, and the lowest modulus material will be squeezed to the surface of the part to be formed as the high modulus material(s) solidifies and shrinks. The pressure balance between the low modulus, still liquid, material maintains the solidifying high modulus material in the center of the part. Accordingly, a part may be manufactured which has a low modulus material on the surface and a high modulus material in the middle of the part. As best understood at the time of filing this application, this configuration may be changed depending upon the slope and relationship of the modulus curves of the materials, and the temperature inside the mold cavity.

Another aspect of the present invention provides a method of gas assisted injection molding in which the above-described methods are used for controlling formation and movement of the bubble within the molten material in the mold cavity. In a preferred embodiment, bubble formation and movement is controlled by sensing gas pressure in the mold cavity, sensing melt pressure in the injection unit, and controlling injection of the molten material into the mold cavity in accordance with the sensed pressures in order to maintain the internal melt pressure of the molten material in the cavity at desired levels during injection. Various embodiments are contemplated. By monitoring and controlling the internal melt pressure within the mold cavity, one can control bubble formation and movement because the internal melt pressure accounts for any mold cavity resistance or partial solidification within the melt, and the internal melt pressure will balance and control the bubble accordingly. The bubble also provides a source of internal pressure for volumetric deficit compensation.

Accordingly, an object of the present invention is to provide a method of injection molding in which a pressure-balanced molding environment is provided for cooling the molten plastic.

A further object of the present invention is to provide a method of injection molding in which degradation of plastic material is decreased as a result of improved processing controls.

Another object of the present invention is to provide a method of injection molding in which less turbulence is created as the molten plastic is injected into the cavity of a mold.

Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a method of injection molding in which surface stresses in the final product are greatly decreased.

A further object of the present invention is to provide a method of injection molding in which shrink, sink, and warpage of the molded part are reduced.

Another object of the present invention is to provide a method of injection molding in which molten plastic cools and solidifies in a consistent, directional manner.

Still another object of the present invention is to provide a method of injection molding in which processing cycle time is reduced, and part weight is reduced.

A still further object of the present invention is to provide a mold capable of maintaining a desired air pressure within a cavity thereof.

Another object is to provide a method of molding non-mixable materials, wherein internal counterpressure is built up within the combination of molten materials to cause the materials to substantially separate when molded.

A further object of the present invention is to provide a method of gas assisted injection molding in which the formation and movement of the bubble within the molten material is controllable.

These and other features, objects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent upon reading the following description therefor together with reference to the accompanying drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a schematic of an injection unit for an injection molding machine having a mold and pressure control system connected thereto according to the present invention;

FIG. 2 is plan view of a back half of a mold according to the present invention;

FIG. 3 is a vertical cross-sectional view taken through FIG. 2 of an injection mold according to the present invention;

FIG. 4 is a graphical illustration of a melt pressure and air pressure cycle in an injection molding machine according to the present invention;

FIG. 5 is a graphical illustration of a pressure difference profile between a melt pressure and an air pressure in an injection molding machine according to the present invention;

FIG. 6 is a graphical illustration of an injection power curve illustrating the advantages of the present invention;

FIG. 7 is a graphical representation of a closed loop control system according to the present invention;

FIG. 8 is an electrical schematic of one implementation illustrating the creation of a core variable according to the present invention;

FIGS. 9a and 9 b illustrate an operator interface for entering control parameters and monitoring control variables for one embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 10 shows a cut-away vertical cross-sectional view illustrating the positioning of the pressure transducer relative to the cavity;

FIG. 11 is a schematic graphical illustration of a melt pressure and air pressure cycle illustrating pressure variations to which the controller must respond;

FIG. 12 is a schematically arranged cut-away vertical cross-section of a sample part molded with two non-mixable materials in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 13 is a schematic illustration of the counterpressure within the molten material and the cavity air pressure; and

FIG. 14 is a graphical illustration of modulus vs. temperature for some sample materials, to be molded in accordance with the present invention;

FIGS. 15a-c illustrate the movement of a gas-assisted melt front through a mold cavity in accordance with the prior art;

FIG. 16 shows a schematically arranged cut-away sectional view of a gas assist mold in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 17 shows a schematically arranged cut-away cross-sectional view of a gas assist mold corresponding with FIG. 15;

FIG. 18 shows a plan view of a sample part to be molded as illustrated in the mold of FIGS. 15 and 16;

FIG. 19 shows a schematic drawing of a pneumatic system for use with the gas assist mold illustrated in FIGS. 16 and 17;

FIGS. 20a-c illustrate the flow of a gas-assisted molten material through a mold cavity in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 21 is a schematic graphical illustration of pressure vs. time and ΔP vs. time for a gas assisted injection molding cycle in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 22 graphically illustrates a scaled pressure profile for an injection cycle, wherein slow injection is used; and

FIG. 23 is a schematically arranged partially cutaway sectional view of an ejector plate with assist-gas carrying capability in accordance with an alternative embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 24 is a cross-sectional view of a sample part molded with two non-mixable materials using gas-assisted injection molding in accordance with the present invention.

BEST MODES FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION

Referring to FIG. 1, an injection molding machine 10 is shown, including an injection unit 12, for use according to the present invention. Plastic resin moves from a hopper 14 into a barrel 16 of the injection molding machine. Heat from barrel 16 and rotational movement of a screw 18 cause the plastic resin to melt and form a shot of plastic to be molded by the machine. The shot of plastic is pressurized by the machine. The melt pressure of the shot of plastic is measured and regulated through a melt pressure transducer 20. A positive shutoff valve is provided at the top of barrel 16 to prevent drool of plastic through the nozzle and to allow pressurization of molten plastic in barrel 16.

A mold 22 is inserted into injection molding machine 10. Mold 22 includes a front half 24 and back half 26. Front half 24 has an aperture 28 formed therethrough for receiving the shot of molten plastic from the injection molding machine. Front half 24 and back half 26 of mold 22 cooperate to form a cavity 30 therebetween. Cavity 30 is in fluid flow communication with aperture 28 for receiving the shot of molten plastic therethrough. The shot of molten plastic is packed into cavity 30 and held therein in order to cool and form a plastic part matching the shape of cavity 30.

Transducers are provided for sensing pressures throughout the molding process. Injection pressure for injection unit 12 is monitored by an injection pressure transducer 32. Fluid or gas pressure is provided to cavity 30 of mold 22 by means of pressurized air supplied through a pneumatic line 34. Of course, a wide variety of gases or liquids could be used. Air pressure in cavity 30 is monitored by a pressure transducer 36 located in a vent so that a true pressure reading may be taken from the cavity. This transducer 36 is preferably located at the last place in the cavity to fill with plastic. The vent with the pressure transducer will be discommunicated from channel 44. This vent 45 is shown in FIG. 10. The vent 45 is sufficiently open (approximately 0.030″0.050″ thick) to allow the molten plastic to flow therein to contact the pressure transducer 36 so that the transducer 36 may sense the melt pressure when the cavity 30 is full.

A rubber seal 38 is provided between front half 24 and back half 26 of mold 22 to prevent escape of pressurized air from cavity 30 of the mold. Often, when molten plastic is injected into a mold under high pressure, front half 24 and back half 26 will separate slightly, thus allowing escape of pressurized air therefrom. Rubber seal 38 is designed to prevent such an escape of pressurized air from cavity 30.

A closed-loop controller 40 is provided with the injection molding machine 10. The closed-loop controller 40 receives signals from various transducers, such as pressure transducers 20, 32, and 36 to monitor injection molding machine 10 throughout the molding process. The controller implements various logic rules to generate control signals based on the signals received from the various transducers. These signals are then communicated to appropriate actuators, such as pneumatic system 37, hydraulic system 39, hydraulic valves 33, and pneumatic valves 46 and 48, to maintain control of injection molding machine 10 throughout the injection molding process. In a preferred embodiment, closed-loop controller 40 is a commercially available programmable logic controller (PLC) with standard control software for controlling an injection molding machine, such as the PROSET 700 available from the Allen-Bradley Company in Milwaukee, Wis. The standard control software is supplemented with custom logic according to the present invention as illustrated and described in greater detail with reference to FIGS. 7-9.

Referring to FIG. 2, a plurality of vents 42 are shown in fluid flow communication with cavity 30. The purpose of these vents is to allow discharge of pressurized air and gases as molten plastic is injected into cavity 30. A channel 44 is provided around cavity 30 in fluid flow communication with vents 42. The pressurized air and gases move through the vents into the channel. A first valve 46 is provided in selective fluid flow communication with channel 44 for providing a pressurized gas from pneumatic line 34 to channel 44.

As also shown in FIG. 2, a second valve 48 is provided in selective fluid flow communication with channel 44 for release of pressurized air therefrom. The purpose of this sealed and valved venting system is to provide venting orifice controls immediately in front of the melt flow, rather than outside of the mold. In this manner, cavity air pressure may be provided to resist the melt pressure as molten plastic is injected into the cavity. The measurable cavity air pressure is a means of communicating with the melt front. Changes in air pressure may be used to determine the behavior of the melt (molten plastic) and translates such information so that the static pressure (counterpressure) of the melt can be calculated.

The air pressure in the cavity causes a force F (see FIG. 1) to act against the oncoming melt front, and is used to manipulate the static pressure of the melt to increase mobility of the liquid plastic molecules so that they may bond together more efficiently and equalize the density of the part while compensating volumetric deficits as the plastic solidifies. The internal static pressure also resists shrinkage forces at the final stages of filling and after filling is complete. When the cavity is completely filled, the prebuilt static pressure not only compensates shrinkage forces but also counteracts surface tension while increasing mobility of the melt for compensating the volumetric deficits created within the first solidification layers.

A method according to the present invention for use with the above described apparatus is based upon the fact that each volumetric unit of molten plastic injected into the cavity will shrink due to adjustment of surface tension forces during cooling, and substantial stresses will build up in the solid part. These conditions may be alleviated by creation of entrained gases within the molten plastic. These entrained gases will act as a lubricator by substantially changing the fluidity of the melt and decreasing the amount of injection pressure required to inject the molten plastic into the cavity. The entrained gases cause the molten plastic to be much more pliable and easier to manipulate. Also, the predicted volumetric difference between the volume of the mold cavity and the volume of a solid part molded by the cavity can be used as a basis for premixing the molten plastic in the barrel at sufficient pressure to resist the volumetric shrink and eliminate the internal stresses.

By generating a certain desired amount of entrained gases and moisture within the molten plastic, a level of partial pressure of the entrained gases and moisture may be established at which movement of the pressurized gas and moisture will be stopped. Also, the decomposition of the gases may be stopped and the gases may be forced to maintain a static position by means of balanced surface tension forces. In addition, negative pressures in the solidifying plastic are eliminated.

The venting system shown in FIG. 2 creates the possibility of maintaining a constant gas pressure resistance in the cavity, which eliminates uneven flow distribution of the molten plastic in the cavity. The molten plastic will be distributed substantially concentrically in the cavity space with respect to aperture 28. This provides the unique possibility for the melt to travel in the cavity and solidify in the cavity under the same pressure characteristics at all sections of the part. This also eliminates the possibility of gases entrained within the molten plastic traveling to the surface of the shot of the plastic. The feeding rate of the molten plastic into the cavity is maintained constant in all areas of the cavity. This constant feeding rate along with the internal pressures created in the entrained gases and moisture provide the advantage of increasing the cooling rates because of earlier pressurized contact of the molten plastic with the cavity walls. This pressurized contact allows the molten plastic to cool more quickly as a result of heat dissipation through the walls of the cavity, as the air pressure in the cavity forces the melt against the walls of the cavity. Increased cooling rates result in substantial cycle time reduction which leads to considerable savings for the manufacturer.

Controlling the air pressure in the cavity of the mold provides the capability of establishing a balanced molding environment for the molten plastic. Processing the molten plastic under these conditions prevents degradation and scission of the polymers which are normally chemically attacked by decomposition products in the presence of moisture.

As a result of the pressure balance between the air pressure in the cavity and the melt pressure, the development of surface tension in the plastic is avoided. Effectively, this balanced pressure system creates a directional solidification of the plastic. In other words, the molten plastic cools in a constant, straight line from the surface of the molten plastic to the center of the plastic. This directional solidification eliminates surfaces stresses, which lead to shrink, sink, and warpage of the part. The end result of this process is the production of a part which is free of shrink and sink, fully stress relieved, and a nearly exact copy of the cavity surface. Furthermore, this process produces parts having strong mechanical properties and configuration stability in addition to enhanced structural integrity.

In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, a method of injection molding for use with an injection molding machine is provided. The first step is to calculate a maximum stress to be experienced by a shot of plastic to be molded in injection molding machine 10 in accordance with the particular mold cavity configuration, the stress being a result of volumetric shrink occurring as the plastic is cooled in cavity 30 of mold 22. This maximum stress will typically occur in the thickest cross-sectional area of the part to be molded. Assuming that the part to be molded is an elongate rod having a rectangular cross-section, the following formulas apply. The maximum uniform load experienced by the part as a result of shrink is calculated as follows: $q = \frac{{yEh}^{3}\left\lbrack {1 + {1.05\left( \frac{a}{b} \right)^{5}}} \right\rbrack}{{ka}^{4}}$

where q is a uniform load per unit area, a is width of the cavity, b is thickness of the cavity, h is height of the cavity, E is apparent modulus of elasticity of the plastic, k is a variable based upon heat deflection temperature of the plastic, and y is a shrinkage factor of the plastic.

The uniform load calculation equations will vary, depending upon the configuration of the part and the plastic to be processed. Of course, these formulas may be programmed into controller 40 so that an operator is only required to enter the properties of the plastic to perform the process.

A maximum mechanical stress to be experienced by the shot of plastic is then calculated in accordance with the maximum uniform load: ${S\quad ({mechanical})} = \frac{{qa}^{2}}{2{h^{2}\left\lbrack {1 + {{.0623}\left( \frac{a}{b} \right)^{6}}} \right\rbrack}}$

where S (mechanical) is a maximum mechanical stress to be experienced by the part, a is width of the cavity, b is thickness of the cavity, h is height of the cavity, and q is the uniform load per unit area.

Again, the maximum mechanical stress calculation equations will vary depending upon part configuration.

This stress is the force-per-unit area which is acting on a material and tending to cause the material to sink or shrink. It is the ratio of the amount of shrinkage forces divided by the cross-sectional area of the body resisting that force. This maximum stress occurs at the location where the maximum shrinkage force occurs. Accordingly, the cross-sectional area is taken perpendicular to the direction of the maximum shrinkage force. General design principles may be used to calculate the area of the particular cross-section. In other words, the maximum stress is equal to the shrinkage force divided by the cross-sectional area taken perpendicular to the direction of the maximum shrinkage force at the thickest section.

A maximum thermal stress to be experienced by the shot of plastic is then calculated in accordance with the following formula:

S (thermal)=dT*L*E

where S (thermal) is a maximum thermal stress to be experienced by the part, dT is a change in the temperature of the plastic between room temperature and the temperature at which the plastic is in a plastic range of deformation, L is a thermal coefficient, and E is a modulus of the plastic. L and E are available from material manufacturer's publications.

Finally, the maximum stress to be experienced by a shot of plastic is determined to be the greater value of S (mechanical) and S (thermal).

Because the above-referenced calculations may become difficult in a part having an irregular shape, the above stress calculations may be avoided by approximating the maximum stress based upon the material used and based upon the configuration of the part to be molded. For example, polypropylene would likely experience maximum stress in the range of 7000-9000 psi, ABS in the range of 7000-11,000 psi, polycarbonate in the range of 8000-14,000 psi, glass-filled materials in the range of 6000-9000 psi, polystyrene in the range of 3000-6000 psi, and TPO in the range of 7000-14,000 psi. The maximum stress should be assumed to be at the upper end of this range if the part is thicker or has a length which would result in substantial stress build up, and the lower end of these ranges should be used if the part is thinner or is of a configuration which will not produce substantial stresses. Commonly known plastic part design considerations may be used in estimating the level of stress to be experienced by a particular material constrained in a particular mold cavity configuration.

The next step in the process is to pressurize a shot of plastic to a first melt pressure as the plastic is plasticized in barrel 16 of injection molding machine 10, the first melt pressure being substantially equal to the calculated maximum stress. Preferably, controller 40 actuates a heater to melt the shot of plastic. Controller 40 also communicates with a hydraulic cylinder and a corresponding pressure transducer to generate control signals to produce the first melt pressure.

Cavity 30 is then pressurized to an air pressure which is substantially equal to the first melt pressure. Preferably, controller 40 communicates with one or more pneumatic solenoid valves and at least one corresponding pressure transducer to control and monitor this pressurization. Injection of the shot of plastic into the cavity is commenced after the air pressure has reached the first melt pressure as indicated by the appropriate pressure transducers and determined by controller 40. As the molten plastic enters cavity 30, the air pressure in cavity 30 acts against the melt pressure in order to provide a pressure balance for the molten plastic.

The maintenance of a pressure difference between the dynamic melt pressure and air pressure in the cavity (preferably via closed-loop control using controller 40) maintains a static pressure within the molten material as it is injected into the mold cavity. This static pressure provides venting power to the melt. This venting power allows the melt to vent, fill, and pack out any ribs or bosses which exist lateral of the flow direction of the molten material. Accordingly, the molten material fully packs out the mold cavity as it moves through the cavity. The static pressure created by the pressure difference also prevents trapping of gases from mold release spray and trapping of moisture from mold release spray.

The “static pressure” is the pressure of the melt acting in all directions, while the “dynamic pressure” is the pressure of the melt in the flow direction. For example, if the dynamic melt pressure is equal to the air pressure in the cavity, then the melt will not flow into the cavity. However, if air pressure is less than the dynamic melt pressure, then the melt will move into the cavity, and the result of the air pressure pushing against the oncoming melt front is to create a “static” pressure in the melt which acts in all directions, including laterally to the flow direction. The air pressure in the cavity acts to compress the melt as it flows into the mold cavity, which creates a general internal static pressure in the molten material as the material tends to expand against this air pressure resistance. This static melt pressure provides pressures or forces acting laterally to the flow direction which helps to force the molten material against the walls of the mold cavity in order to “pack out” the material from inside so that it is fully pressed against the walls of the cavity.

The static pressure also gives the molten material “venting power”. This is the ability of the molten material to enter into lateral indentations (or ribs) in the mold cavity and push any air or other gases out of that indentation (i.e., “vent out”). Thus, the molten material can fully fill the indentation (or rib) and “pack out” that area as it flows past the indentation due to its dynamic pressure. The static pressure also counteracts volumetric shrinkage forces for prevention of sink marks or internal voids.

As the shot of plastic is injected into the cavity, the melt pressure on the shot of plastic is increased from the first melt pressure to a second melt pressure, while maintaining the air pressure within the cavity substantially constant. In addition, a substantially constant difference between the air pressure within the cavity and the second melt pressure is maintained during a substantial portion of a period of time in which the shot of plastic is being injected into the cavity. This pressure difference creates a resultant static pressure or counterpressure within the molten material. Reference to FIGS. 4 and 5 further illustrates this method.

Referring to FIG. 4, the air pressure 50 in cavity 30 and the melt pressure 52 of the molten plastic are illustrated as a function of time. During the period of time t1, the air pressure 50 is built up to equal the melt pressure 52. This is preferably accomplished via controller 40 sending appropriate control signals to pneumatic valves 46 and 48, and hydraulic valves 33 while monitoring the signals produced by the corresponding pressure transducers 36, and 20 and 32, respectively. The time period t2 is a relaxation time to allow the air pressure to equalize with the melt pressure. During time period t3, the melt pressure is increased by increasing the hydraulic pressure applied via hydraulic system 39 and hydraulic line 35 from the first melt pressure to the second melt pressure and injection of the molten plastic into the cavity begins. During time period t4, controller 40 effects closed-loop control of the pressure difference between the second melt pressure and air pressure 50 such that the difference is maintained substantially constant, as shown in FIG. 5. This difference is controlled by establishing a single “core variable” for the controller which may be adjusted by various other operating parameters illustrated and described with reference to FIG. 7. During time period t5, melt pressure 52 is decreased from the second melt pressure to the first melt pressure, and the melt and air pressures are equalized during time period t6. At time t7, air pressure 50 in the cavity is released and the next shot of plastic is prepared.

The present invention contemplates that no specific pressure profiles are required for the air pressure or the melt pressure. The key to this invention is the development and maintenance of a pressure difference between the air (fluid) pressure and the melt pressure for a substantial portion of the injection via closed-loop control. The value for the pressure difference is generated in accordance with the specific usage requirements of a particular application in order to control the amount of dynamic pressure (which is related to static pressure), and the pressure difference may vary accordingly. Therefore, the air pressure and melt pressure may be decreased or increased in accordance with any pressure profile, so long as the pressure difference between the melt pressure and air pressure is maintained substantially constant. Furthermore, it is not a requirement that the air pressure be originally set equal to the maximum stress calculation. Again, the key is the development and maintenance of a pressure difference between the air (fluid) pressure and melt pressure as the molten plastic is injected into the cavity. Varying air pressure and melt pressure profiles are contemplated under the present invention.

Finally, the method is repeated by returning to the step of pressurizing the next shot of plastic to a first melt pressure in barrel 16. Accordingly, injection molded products are produced repeatedly.

It is further preferable to inject the shot of plastic into cavity 30 from barrel 16 at relatively low rates. Manufacturers commonly provide suggested injection speed limits specified as high and low speed values. It is desirable to inject a molten plastic into the cavity in the lower 10% of rates suggested by the manufacturer in order to decrease turbulence and material degradation of the plastic. Similarly, manufacturers provide high and low injection pressure values. It is desirable to inject the plastic into the cavity at an injection pressure in the lower 10% of ranges suggested by the manufacturer. Filling the cavity at low injection speeds and low injection pressures avoids destruction and degradation of the polymer chains.

The present invention further provides a method of injection molding for use with an injection molding machine comprising: (a) forming a plurality of vents 42 in a mold for use in the injection molding machine, the mold having a cavity formed therein, the vents being in fluid flow communication with the cavity 30 of the mold to vent pressurized air from the cavity, while maintaining a substantially constant air pressure in the cavity, according to the following formula: A=0.24241*W*T1/(C*P1), where A is a cross-sectional area of the vent, W is discharge of air through the vent in pounds per second, C is a coefficient of flow, P1 is the air pressure in the cavity in pounds per square inch, and T1 is a temperature in the cavity in degrees fahrenheit; (b) forming a channel 44 in the mold in fluid flow communication with the vents 42; (c) sealing the mold to prevent leakage of pressurized air from the cavity and from the channel; (d) providing first and second valves 46,48 in selective fluid flow communication with the channel 44 formed by the mold, the first valve 46 being selectively movable between a closed position wherein pressurized air is prevented from moving therethrough and an open position wherein pressurized air is allowed to enter the channel 44 therethrough, and the second valve 48 being selectively movable between a closed position wherein pressurized air is prevented from moving therethrough and an open position wherein pressurized air is allowed to discharge therethrough from the channel 44; (e) calculating a maximum stress to be experienced by a shot of plastic to be molded in the injection molding machine, the stress being the result of volumetric shrink occurring as the plastic is cooled in the cavity of the mold; (f) pressurizing a shot of molten plastic in the barrel 16 of the injection molding machine to a first melt pressure, the first melt pressure being substantially equal to the maximum stress; (g) moving the first valve 46 to the open position; (h) moving the second valve 48 to the closed position; (i) introducing pressurized air through the first valve 46 into the cavity 30 until the air pressure in the cavity is substantially equal to the first melt pressure; (j) moving the first valve to the closed position; (k) commencing injection of the shot of plastic into the cavity 30; (l) increasing the melt pressure of the shot of plastic to a second melt pressure; thus creating a pressure difference between the second melt pressure and the gas pressure in the cavity; (m) maintaining the pressure difference between the second melt pressure and the air pressure in the cavity substantially constant for a substantial portion of the period of time in which plastic is being injected into the cavity; (n) moving the second valve 48 to the open position to release pressurized air from the channel; and (o) returning to step (f).

It should be understood that these steps need not necessarily be performed sequentially. Variations in the order of the steps provided in this method are contemplated as part of the present invention. It is also understood that the pressures need not be equalized prior to injection, as long as the counterpressure or static pressure is maintained substantially equal to or above the calculated stress. The pressure equalization is for conveniently resetting or zeroing the system before injection. The static pressure or counterpressure may be greater than or equal to the calculated maximum stress, but should not be so great to degrade material bonding.

Reference to FIG. 4 provides a basis for description of the valves 46, 48 and the venting system as provided in the second embodiment of the present invention described above. Beginning with step (h) of the second embodiment of the present invention, the first valve 46 is moved to the open position and the second valve 48 is moved to the closed position prior to the time period t1 of FIG. 4. During the t1 period, pressurized gas (preferably air) is introduced through the first valve 46 into the cavity 30 until the pressure in the cavity is substantially equal to the first melt pressure. The first valve 46 is then moved to the closed position. The first and second valves remain closed as the molten plastic is injected into the cavity. A pressure difference is then established and maintained between the pressure in the cavity and a second melt pressure for a substantial period of time (t4). The melt pressure and cavity pressure are then equalized (t5,t6), and the second valve 48 is moved to the open position to release pressurized gas from the channel (T7).

The purpose of this closed venting system is to provide a molding environment for the molten plastic wherein pressures acting upon each individual gas molecule are balanced so that very little movement of gas occurs within the plastic between adjacent molecules. This balance prevents gas molecules from moving toward the surface of the plastic or uniting with other gas molecules to form larger voids or cells.

One skilled in the art will appreciate the utility of adding chemical blowing agents to the molten plastic. Chemical blowing agents are useful in controlling the amount of gas decomposed and entrained in the melt during plastification. These blowing agents generate inert gases when heated. The gases create voids in the material which can lead to substantial weight reduction of the part. The pressure of these voids may be used to help fill the cavity and to pack out the plastic against the walls of the cavity. The present invention will control movement of these inert gases by controlling the partial pressure of the gases. The internal counterpressure within the melt causes the plastic molecules to feed into the solidifying material against the wall as it solidifies and shrinks, therefore the internal melt will have lower pressure as the molecules migrate away from the center of the melt. Accordingly, the inert gases will tend to move toward the center of the melt, because the temperature is higher and the pressure is lower in that area. In this manner, these gases will not move to the surface of the part and cause appearance problems.

Referring to FIGS. 1-3, the present invention further provides a mold 22 for use in an injection molding machine 10. The mold has a front half 24 and a back half 26, the front half 24 having an aperture 28 formed therethrough for receiving molten plastic from the injection molding machine. Front half 24 and back half 26 cooperate to form a cavity 30 therebetween. Cavity 30 is in fluid flow communication with aperture 28 to receive the molten plastic therefrom. A plurality of vents 42 are formed in back half 26 of the mold, as shown in FIG. 2. Vents 42 have first and second ends thereof. The first end of each of the plurality of vents is in fluid flow communication with cavity 30. The vents are configured according to the following formula to maintain a substantially constant air pressure in cavity 30 as the cavity is being filled with plastic: A=0.24241*W*T1/(C*P1), where A is the total cross-sectional area of a representative single vent, W is discharge of pressurized air through the vent in pounds per second, C is a coefficient of flow, P1 is the air pressure in the cavity in pounds per square inch, and T1 is a temperature in the cavity in degrees Fahrenheit. The total area A may be divided by the desired size of each vent to give the number of vents spaced around the cavity.

A channel 44 is formed in back half 26 of the mold. Channel 44 is in fluid flow communication with the second end of each of the plurality of vents 42. Cavity 30, vents 42, and channel 44 are shown in FIG. 3. A pair of valves 46, 48 are in selective fluid flow communication with channel 44. The first valve 46 is adapted to selectively receive pressurized air from a pneumatic line 34 to provide pressurized air to channel 44. The second valve 48 is adapted to selectively allow discharge of pressurized air from channel 44.

A rubber seal 38 is provided in back half 26 of the mold and circumscribes cavity 30 and channel 44, and is positioned between front half 24 and back half 26 to prevent discharge of pressurized air from cavity 30 and channel 44 as cavity 30 is being filled with molten plastic. Upon injection, front half 24 and back half 26 have a tendency to separate slightly. Rubber seal 38 prevents leakage of pressurized air from the cavity when this separation occurs.

The injection power curve shown in FIG. 6 further illustrates the advantages of the present invention. Using prior art systems, the injection pressure or melt pressure and flow rate are limited by the power curve line 70. At point X₁, the mold cavity is full and maximum injection pressure is received from the machine. At X₂, there is no mold resistance, and maximum flow rate is achieved. A line connecting these two points defines the limit of power available in this system. For example, if the dynamic melt pressure P is calculated to be P₁, the flow rate is limited to Q₁ in accordance with the prior art systems. However, this flow rate may be too low to support the feeding of solidifying material during filling of the mold because cooling occurs too quickly. Therefore, in accordance with the present invention, an air pressure 72 is added to the other side of the melt, the power curve line 70 is therefore no longer limiting and the mold cavity can be effectively fed at a high flow rate using a high pressure. Effectively, the static pressure created gives the possibility to exceed the maximum machine power curve in accordance with the prior art and to achieve pressures and flow rates within the cross-hatched area of FIG. 6.

Referring to FIG. 7, a graphical representation of a control system according to the present invention is illustrated. The present invention provides a control system which utilizes a core variable, represented generally by reference numeral 80, as the input to a standard proportional-integral-differential (PID) control loop 82 to control the injection molding process. The output of control loop 82 is a signal which controls a hydraulic valve 82, which is preferably one of hydraulic valves 33 illustrated in FIG. 1.

As illustrated in FIG. 7, the control system of the present invention provides an open architecture for the injection molding process engineer to adapt and refine the molding process for particular parts and materials using any one or more process variables, represented generally by reference numeral 86. Process variables 86 represent the physical values obtained from various sensors, such as pressure transducers 20 and 36. These physical values are processed by controller 40, or alternatively by external signal conditioners, or both. The processing may include any of a number of variable calculations, indicated generally by reference numeral 88, which are used for unit conversion, scaling, and to reflect the importance of the particular variable to an application of interest. These calculations may incorporate expert, knowledge, or rule based algorithms, heuristic algorithms, fuzzy logic, genetic algorithms, or the like which would effectively modify the response of the control system for particular applications, parts, or materials.

Process variables 86 may be used directly (with or without external scaling), or via variable calculations 88 to adjust core variable 80 and generate a current control variable 90. The process variables 86 may be acted upon by an integral, differential, summation, etc., and may then be scaled by a scaling equation (such as x=ay+b, where a is the scaling factor, y is the result of calculation 88, b is an offset, and x is the current variable adjustment), the scaled variable will then be used to adjust the current control variable 90.

The current control variable 90 represents the feedback signal for PID control loop 82. Any of a number of desired set points, represented generally by reference numeral 92, may be selected as an input to PID control loop 82 which represents the “desired” value for the output. As such, PID control loop 82 will continuously adjust the signal generated for hydraulic valve 84 throughout the injection molding process to minimize the error between the value of current variable 90 and the value of desired set point 92.

The various values from the process variables 86, variable calculations 88, core variable 80, current variable 90 and PID loop 82 may be logged (illustrated as box 94) for creation of further expert algorithms.

An alternative core variable adjustment may be accomplished by differentiating the nozzle melt pressure over the screw position (dP/dS). dS represents a unit of stroke of the screw. The dP/dS calculation may be used for core variable adjustment. In this manner, the system will recognize resistance at the nozzle.

Referring to FIG. 8, an electrical schematic is shown illustrating one implementation for creating a core variable according to the present invention. The particular implementation illustrated was necessary to overcome limitations (most notably the scan rate) of the PLC used in a preferred embodiment. As such, other implementations may be required depending upon the particular controller utilized. In the implementation illustrated, a signal conditioning module 100 for a hydraulic pressure transducer, a pressure controller with built-in signal conditioning 102 for a nozzle melt pressure transducer, and a pressure controller with built-in signal conditioning 104 for a mold cavity pressure transducer are connected to an input/output (I/O) module 106 of the process controller and in selective communication therewith via relay contacts 108, 110, 112, and 114. In a preferred embodiment, signal conditioner 100, and pressure controllers 102, 104 are manufactured by Dynisco Corporation and I/O module 106 is a 1771-QDC module available from Allen-Bradley.

In operation, when relay R1 is energized, normally open contacts 108 provide an electrical communication path from conditioning module 100 to I/O module 106 while simultaneously electrically disconnecting conditioning module 102 via normally closed contacts 110. Conversely, when relay R1 is not energized, conditioning module 102 (and therefore the nozzle melt pressure transducer) is electrically connected to I/O module 106 while conditioning module 100 (and its associated hydraulic pressure transducer) is electrically disconnected from I/O module 106.

Relay R2 functions in a similar fashion using its normally open contacts 112 and normally closed contacts 114 to connect a mold cavity pressure transducer to I/O module 106 through conditioning module 104 when relay R2 is de-energized. When energized, relay R2 connects one input 116 from cavity pressure signal conditioning module 104 and one input 118 from nozzle melt pressure signal conditioning module 102 to I/O module 106. This effectively supplies a signal representing the difference between the nozzle melt pressure and the mold cavity pressure to I/O module 106. The “delta” box 119 illustrates the difference which becomes the core variable. For proper operation, modules 102 and 104 should be adjusted to provide compatible voltage level signals scaled to their respective measured pressures. Controller 40 then implements a PID control loop using this pressure difference signal as described with reference to FIG. 7. The PID control loop produces a signal on output 120 of I/O module 106 which is used to control a hydraulic system to control injection pressure.

Referring to FIGS. 9a and 9 b, an operator interface for one embodiment of the present invention is illustrated. This operator interface allows the operator to enter various control parameters and monitor process variables during the injection process. The interface includes an area for labeling the particular parameter or variable, indicated generally by reference numeral 130, in addition to areas for entering values 132 or ranges 136,138 of control parameters and for displaying actual values 134 with corresponding units 140. Entering a value in area 132, in effect, implements one of the many alternative control strategies illustrated in FIG. 7. As such, the building blocks, i.e. the control parameters and control variables, of an open architecture control system are easily restructured to adapt the control system to particular applications, products, or materials.

Referring to FIG. 11, some pressure variations are illustrated to which the closed loop control must respond. This drawing correlates substantially with FIG. 4, but for the variations illustrated. Variation “a” illustrates an increase in melt pressure. This probably indicates an increase in mold resistance or a resistance from partial solidification. In order to compensate, the controller should reduce the injection pressure or injection speed to maintain the pressure difference between the melt pressure and air pressure substantially constant. Variation “b” illustrates a decrease in both melt pressure and air pressure. The melt pressure reduction may be a result of changed viscosity, indicating a temperature problem, and the air pressure reduction may be due to an air pressure leak, etc. In order to compensate, the controller should increase the injection pressure to raise both the melt pressure and air pressure. Variation “c” illustrates an increase in both melt pressure and air pressure, and in order to compensate, the controller should reduce the injection pressure to correct both. Variation “d” illustrates a decrease in melt pressure, which is probably representative of a change in viscosity, and the injection pressure should be increased to adjust accordingly. Variation “e” illustrates a decrease in melt pressure and an increase in air pressure, which may represent both a viscosity change and an increase in mold resistance. In this case, we decrease the injection pressure to correct. Finally, variation “f” illustrates an increase in air pressure. This probably indicates that a vent is plugged. In this instance, no correction is made unless the air pressure is approaching an air combustion level which will cause burning of the plastic.

FIG. 13 schematically illustrates the internal counterpressure (static pressure) P_(CP) within the melt acting against the cavity air pressure P_(a) during injection. As illustrated schematically by the length of the arrows, the counterpressure is greater than the air pressure. This is the goal of the control system.

It has been discovered that the above-described process provides the capability of molding relatively non-mixable materials to form a layered unitary manufacturer. By “non-mixable”, it is meant that the materials are not more than partially soluble within each other, and do not degrade or chemically attack each other, and maintain their substantial identity when commingled together. It is desirable, but not necessary, that the two materials be bondable when molded together. It is also possible that one material may be partially trapped within another material as the materials solidify—this possibility is considered to be within the definition of “non-mixable”.

In other words, this invention provides the possibility of manufacturing a layered unitary manufacture injection molded from a plurality of materials normally non-miscible (non-mixable) and commingled in a non-laminar fashion prior to being injection molded into a combination of materials oriented in a laminar fashion as a result of such injection molding. It is necessary that the materials be combinable in a satisfactory manner, such that no undesirable by-products are produced by the combination.

The plurality of materials could be two or more materials. With this invention, it is possible to provide any variety of material combinations. For example, a molder could mix a more expensive material, such as TPE, with a polyethylene regrind material, and the TPE would form a substantially uniform, laminar outer layer over the polyethylene regrind as the part is molded. Therefore, the material cost for manufacturing the part would be decreased substantially, as the regrind material is far less expensive than most newly manufactured materials, and may be hidden in the middle of the part as molded.

Some other examples are as follows: ABS and polypropylene could be mixed together; a plastic material could be mixed with a paint material, wherein the paint material forms an outer layer on the part to be molded; and a plastic material could be mixed with a paint and a clear coat to form a multi-layer product. An endless variety of combinations are possible using this process.

This method may be accomplished, in a preferred embodiment, in the following manner: 1) supplying pressurized fluid to a mold cavity prior to injection; 2) injecting a combination of non-mixable materials into the mold cavity against the pressurized fluid, thereby creating a resultant counterpressure within the combination of materials; and 3) maintaining the counterpressure within the combination of materials sufficiently to cause the materials to solidify in a predetermined configuration based on their respective moduli.

As best understood at the time of filing this patent application, as the materials are injected and begin to solidify within the mold cavity, the material with the higher modulus begins to solidify first at a particular temperature and begins to form a semi-solid structure. As this semi-solid structure cools, it shrinks and squeezes out the other material (or materials) which is still in liquid state. The counterpressure creates a situation in which the liquid is all at the same pressure, so the solidifying material will stay in the center between the balance of liquid pressures on opposing sides thereof, thereby facilitating the formation of a layered configuration. If more than two materials are present in the combination, the materials will solidify in order of decreasing modulus. Accordingly, the highest modulus material will remain in the center of the part to be molded, and the lowest modulus material will eventually solidify at the surface of the part to be molded. The layers formed will be of substantially uniform thickness as a result of the counterpressure build up.

The materials moduli are commonly available from material suppliers manuals. The modulus is a number which represents the attraction between molecules at a particular temperature. Referring to FIG. 14, modulus vs. temperature is illustrated for three materials (P1, P2, P3). If P1 and P2 are molded together as described herein, the moduli of the respective materials will equalize at a certain temperature. At this point, as the temperature continues to drop, one material may be partially entrapped within the other and solidify therein because it now has a greater modulus. This partial entrapment of one material within the other during solidification due to one modulus surpassing the other does not create a problem and does fall within our definition of “non-mixable”. In some instances, the modulus curves may even cross several times, which would result in such partial entrapment.

In such material combinations in which the modulus curves cross, it is difficult to predict which material will stay substantially in the middle and which material will be squeezed to the surface of the part to be formed. This will depend upon the temperature conditions of the cavity and the slope of the respective modulus curves. Referring to FIG. 14, if the first solidification begins to the right of the intersection of curves P1 and P2, it is expected that material P2 will remain in the middle of the part to be formed and material P1 will be squeezed to the surface, and vice-versa if the first solidification begins to the left of the intersection. However, depending on the slope of the modulus curves and the temperature in the cavity, it is possible that the lower modulus material could be squeezed inside the higher modulus material (rather than outside). It appears that the material behavior will be definable based on the moduli and the size of the internal counterpressure. Manipulation of the internal counterpressure within the combination of materials may be used to enhance separation of the materials and to select the best configuration for the materials.

A sample layered unitary manufacture is illustrated in FIG. 12. As shown, the material (Y) with the higher modulus will stay substantially in the middle of the part as molded, and the material (X) with the lower modulus will form a layer of substantially uniform thickness about the periphery of the part to be molded.

At the time of filing this application, only a limited number of materials have been tested in this manner, and the mixtures have varied from 50/50 to 80/20. It is expected that the ratio of materials is unlimited, as the counterpressure creates a situation in which the material with the lowest modulus will always migrate to the surface of the part. This creates the possibility of using an inexpensive material in the center of the part, and a “mold-in-color” material may form a very thin layer on the surface of the part, thereby substantially reducing manufacturing costs. Another possibility is that vinyl may be molded with the part such that the vinyl forms an outer layer. One combination which appears to be very successful is that of 75% polypropylene regrind and 25% virgin TPE. These materials appear to form a solid bond therebetween, which is desirable, if possible. Again, a variety of possibilities are attainable.

With respect to the maximum stress calculations described above, it is expected that some combination representative of the proportion of the materials and their respective characteristics would be appropriate in determining variables, such as E,k,y and L discussed previously. At the time of filing this application, it is recognized that a substantial range of counterpressure settings would produce high quality molded parts, and therefore it seems that approximations for the stress calculations may be appropriate.

It has further been discovered that the present invention as described above is effective in eliminating the gas assist injection molding problems with controlling movement of the bubble within the molten material, as discussed in the Background of the Invention section. By controlling the internal melt pressure of the molten material within the mold cavity, the bubble pressure, size and location are all controlled accordingly.

Referring to FIGS. 16 and 17, a mold 200 is schematically illustrated in accordance with the present invention. The mold 200 includes first and second mold halves 202,204 which cooperate to form a mold cavity 206 therebetween, which is configured to form a molded part, such as the part P illustrated in a top view in FIG. 18. As shown, the mold half 204 includes an air pressure feed line 208 for prepressurizing the mold cavity 206 with fluid (preferably pressurized air) through the vents 210. A pressure transducer 212 is schematically illustrated in FIG. 17, and is positioned within a vent channel which is discommunicated from the rest of the vents, this particular vent channel being sufficiently open to allow molten plastic to flow in and touch the pressure transducer 212 such that the pressure transducer 212 senses air pressure while the cavity is filling, and senses melt pressure when the cavity is full with molten material M.

The mold half 202 includes air channels 214,216, which feed pressurized air into the forming bubble B inside the melt M through the gas injectors 220,222. As shown in FIG. 16, the gas injectors each include a sleeve 224 having an opening 226 formed therein, which communicates through the vent 228 to the channel 214. The pressurized air enters from the channel 214 through the vent 228 into the opening 226 and along the grooves 230 formed in the injector pin 232, and finally forms the bubble B within the melt M in the cavity 206. The grooves 230 are sized to behave like small vents approximately 0.001 to 0.002 inch deep such that molten plastic cannot flow therein, but pressurized gas can flow therethrough. The gas injectors 220,222 are shown schematically large to facilitate understanding, but in practice would preferably be smaller for functional purposes.

Turning to FIG. 19, a pneumatic diagram for providing pressurized air to the bubble and air cavity is shown. The source of pressurized air 234 forces air through the valve 236 to the filtration device 238 and is split to the pressure regulators 240,242, each of which include a gauge 244,246, respectively. A pressure amplifier 241 and reservoir 239 are also provided. The air then passes through the pressure valves 246,248, through the check valves 250,252, and finally through the hoses 254,256. A relief valve 258 is provided for discharging pressurized air between cycles. The hose 254 leads to the channel 204 for supplying pressurized air to the mold cavity 206, and hose 256 will be split and lead to channels 214,216 for supplying pressurized air to the gas injectors 220,222. Hose 254 is also provided with a relief valve 257 for bleeding off pressurized gas when necessary.

Accordingly, as the molten material M enters the mold cavity through the gate 260, it experiences a force F from the prepressurized air in the mold cavity 206, as illustrated in FIG. 16, and this air pressure force F creates a resultant internal counterpressure or internal melt pressure within the molten material. As the molten material M flows past the gas injector 220, a bubble B is formed within the molten material M because the force of the pressurized gas supplied through the gas injector 220 is greater than the internal counterpressure or internal melt pressure within the molten material M. As the melt flows over the gas injector, the melt flow separates the two air sources (i.e., the channel 208 cavity air source and the gas injector 220), and the bubble is formed. As the molten material M continues to flow through the cavity, the bubble B continues to grow with it, and extends to the second gas injector 222, as shown in FIG. 17. With the present invention, one or more gas injectors could be used. Preferably, a plurality of gas injectors would be used, with one gas injector positioned in each of the thickest portions of the mold cavity.

Turning to FIGS. 20A-C, it is understood that the development and maintenance of an internal counterpressure within the molten material provides the capability to maintain the bubble substantially within the center of the hollow molded part as formed. As the molten material M flows through the mold cavity 262, it experiences a flow restriction at R where the cross-sectional area of the mold cavity 262 is substantially reduced. At this point, due to the flow restriction, the internal counterpressure or internal melt pressure within the molten material will increase, and the AP will change. In response, the control system described previously will reduce the injection pressure or reduce the injection speed in order to maintain the substantially constant difference between the melt pressure in the nozzle in the sensed cavity air pressure, thereby maintaining the internal melt pressure at the desired level. Because the internal melt pressure maintains a substantially constant level, there is no substantial increase of the assist gas pressure within the bubble, therefore the bubble will not blow through the front surface of the melt front, thereby destroying the part, nor will it move around uncontrollably. Rather, because the internal melt pressure or internal counterpressure provides forces F_(M) acting in all directions, including directly against the bubble B, the bubble B is pushed against equally on opposing sides so that the bubble B will stay substantially within the center of the molten material as the part is formed. Therefore, as the molten material flows past the flow restriction R, no thinned-down section will occur immediately adjacent the flow restriction R (as illustrated with respect to the prior art in FIG. 15C), thereby substantially enhanc- ing the structural integrity of the hollow molded part to be formed.

Schematic sample pressure vs. time and ΔP vs. time profiles are shown in FIG. 21. As shown, in the cavity air filling region, the assist pressure P_(assist) and the cavity air pressure P_(cavity) each pressurize the mold cavity prior to injection by means of the gas injectors 220,222 and the channel 208. These pressures combine to form P₁ in the static region. Simultaneously, the molten material is pre-pressurized within the barrel of the injector unit to a level in accordance with the maximum stress calculation described previously. At this point, the assist pressure and cavity air pressure have cooperated to create a sensed cavity air pressure of P1 within the mold cavity. This P1 is preferably equal to the sensed melt pressure in the barrel as the melt is pre-pressurized within the barrel of the injector unit. Injection is then commenced, and the transition phase begins. The sensed-melt pressure P_(melt sensed) in the barrel (nozzle) begins to increase as the molten material is injected into the mold cavity against the pressurized air within the cavity. As the melt moves into the cavity, the pressure sensor within the cavity senses an increase in air pressure P_(cavity sensed) as the cavity air is compressed by the oncoming melt front. At time t1, the melt front reaches the gas injector 220, and the assist pressure P_(bubble) creates the bubble B within the molten material as the molten material separates the assist gas source 220 from the cavity air source. Because the bubble pressure is slightly greater than the internal melt pressure, the bubble will grow until the bubble pressure is substantially equalized with the melt pressure. The closed loop control system maintains the substantially constant pressure difference (ΔP) between the sensed cavity pressure and the sensed melt pressure within the barrel in the dynamic region.

As described previously, the system will react to any pressure changes due to mold cavity resistance, partial solidification within the melt, etc., by sensing changes in the cavity air pressure or in the melt pressure within the nozzle, and will adjust accordingly by altering the injection pressure or injection speed to maintain the internal melt pressure or internal counter-pressure at the desired levels. By controlling the internal melt pressure, this system can control the size, position and pressure within the bubble. When the cavity is full, the closed-loop controlled pack region begins (FIG. 21). As shown in FIG. 21 (and later described with reference to FIG. 22), in the pack and hold region (identified as “PACK” in FIGS. 21 and 22), a smaller pressure difference is maintained between the sensed melt pressure in the nozzle and the sensed melt pressure within the cavity. Because the cavity is now full, the melt will be in contact with the transducer 212, so the cavity melt pressure is now directly sensed. This minimum pressure difference is maintained to prevent flow back of material through the gate or sprue, and to prevent sink and control shrink during pack and hold. of course, the ΔP could be established by sensing the bubble pressure, extrapolating the bubble pressure, monitoring and extrapolating the various pressures, and determining and controlling the ΔP in a variety of manners.

FIG. 22 graphically illustrates a scaled pressure profile for an injection cycle. Cavity air filling occurs between times t_(c) and t_(a). Pressure equalization occurs between times t_(a) and t_(b). When injection begins, the transition is made between times t_(b) and t_(c). Between t_(c) and t_(d) cavity melt injection occurs under closed-loop control, and the ΔP is maintained between the sensed melt pressure in the barrel (nozzle) and the sensed air pressure in the cavity. When the cavity is full at time t_(d), the pack stage begins. During the pack stage, a small substantially constant pressure difference is maintained by closed loop control in order to prevent flow back of the melt from the cavity, and to prevent sink and control shrink, as described above with reference to FIG. 21. The FIG. 22 pressure profile illustrates a slow injection scheme. A faster injection scheme would merely compress the cycle illustrated.

The present invention also contemplates injecting assist pressure gas through one gas injector pin, and draining the assist pressure gas through another pin in order to cool down the bubble surface, which helps eliminate stress buildup and potential warp.

FIG. 23 shows a schematically arranged ejector plate assembly 270 which comprises assist gas carrying capability. The ejector plate assembly 270 includes opposing plates 272,274 having a channel 276 formed therein in communication with a port 278. At least one gas injector 280 (preferably more than one) is supported by the plates 272,274 and is disposed within the aperture 282 formed in plate 272. The gas injector 280 includes a sleeve 284 having a channel 286 formed therein. An ejector pin 288 includes a plurality of vent-type grooves 290 which allow pressurized air to pass therethrough from the sleeve 286. Accordingly, pressurized air is fed through the port 278, through the channel 276, through the vent 292 into the channel 286, and through the grooves 290 to form the bubble. Seals 294,296 are also provided.

The stress calculations described previously will be substantially the same using the assist gas pressure method described here, however, the maximum stress calculation will likely be lower because the part will be hollow in its thickest sections, so the cross-sectional areas will be reduced, which reduces the shrinkage thereacross.

The goal is to have the assist gas pressure within the bubble and the internal melt pressure substantially equal enough to prevent sink and shrink yet allow the internal bubble and melt front to grow with each other in a manner that the size and location of the bubble are not adversely affected by partial solidification or mold cavity resistance.

Initially, the bubble pressure will be slightly greater than the internal melt pressure so that the bubble can grow within the melt, and the internal melt pressure will be greater than the cavity air pressure. Eventually, the internal melt pressure will increase to a level equal to or greater than the bubble pressure, which will stop the growth of the bubble, and may even shrink the size of the bubble if the internal melt pressure continues to grow. If the bubble pressure becomes substantially greater than the internal melt pressure, it will blow a hole through the melt front. The bubble continues to grow until the melt experiences mold cavity resistance, partial solidification, or cavity air resistance, each of which will increase the internal melt pressure to a level greater than the bubble pressure, which then will cause the bubble to begin to decrease in size, which causes the bubble pressure to increase. When the bubble pressure is greater than the assist pressure within the pin, the air will stop feeding into the bubble. The control system will be operative to maintain a substantial balance between the internal melt pressure and the bubble pressure.

By measuring the melt pressure at the nozzle and the cavity air pressure, the bubble pressure is controlled by adjusting the injection pressure or injection speed because the bubble pressure will be dictated by the internal melt pressure, which is controlled by mold cavity resistance, resistance due to partial solidification and cavity air pressure resistance. As described previously, the internal melt pressure keeps the bubble balanced substantially within the middle of the mold cavity as the product solidifies because the internal melt pressure pushes equally on opposing sides of the bubble to balance it.

Accordingly, the method of the present invention could be described in accordance with the follow steps, which need not be performed in the order presented:

(1) supplying pressurized fluid to the mold cavity prior to injecting the molten material into the mold cavity;

(2) injecting the molten material into the mold cavity against the pressurized fluid to establish a resultant internal counterpressure within the molten material;

(3) injecting a pressurized assist gas into the molten material to form a gas bubble; and

(4) controlling the injection of molten material into the cavity in a manner to maintain the internal counterpressure in accordance with the maximum shrinkage stress within the molten material.

The method of the present invention could also be described in accordance with the following steps, which need not be performed in the order presented:

(1) supplying pressurized fluid to the mold cavity prior to injecting the molten material into the mold cavity;

(2) injecting the molten material into the mold cavity against the pressurized fluid;

(3) injecting a pressurized assist gas into the molten material;

(4) sensing the pressure of the pressurized fluid in the mold cavity during the injection of molten material into the mold cavity;

(5) sensing the pressure of the molten material within the injection unit during the injection of molten material into the mold cavity; and

(6) controlling the injection of molten material into the mold cavity in response to the sensed pressures.

Alternatively, the present invention could be stated in accordance with the following steps, which need not be performed in the order presented:

(1) supplying pressurized fluid to the mold cavity prior to injecting the molten material into the mold cavity;

(2) injecting the molten material into the mold cavity against the pressurized fluid;

(3) injecting a pressurized assist gas into the molten material at a substantially constant gas pressure;

(4) sensing the pressure of the pressurized fluid in the mold cavity during the injection of molten material into the mold cavity; and

(5) controlling the injection of molten material into the mold cavity in response to the sensed pressure to maintain the internal melt pressure of the molten material at desired levels during injection.

The present invention also provides a hollow molded product manufactured by the method described, such as the product shown in FIG. 24. The hollow molded product could comprise molten material which is a combination of normally non-mixable materials as previously described. Such a hollow injection molded product would have an outer layer of a first material of substantially uniform thickness sufficiently small to minimize the amount of that material required, such that a relatively expensive material could be used in small amounts. An inner body of a second material of substantially uniform thickness and having a bubble formed therein would be disposed within the first material. The inner body would be substantially absent of the first material. Accordingly, substantial manufacturing cost reductions may be achieved. Also, the hollow injection molded product could comprises several normally non-mixable materials arranged substantially concentrically and separated in a lamina fashion and having a bubble formed substantially in the center of the part.

While the best modes for practicing the invention have been described in detail, those familiar with the art to which this invention relates will recognize various alternative designs and embodiments for practicing the invention within the scope of the appended claims. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A hollow molded product formed in a mold cavity having the molded configuration of an outer layer of a first material of substantially uniform predetermined thickness, said outer layer having an outer surface and an interior surface, and an inner layer of a second material of substantially uniform thickness completely disposed within the outer layer and in contact with said outer layer about said entire interior surface of said outer layer, said outer and inner layers injection molded in the form of said molded configuration from a combination of said first material and second material in an injection molding machine against pressurized fluid in said mold cavity wherein said combination of said first material and second material separated during injection molding to form said molded configuration, and having a bubble formed therein, said inner layer being substantially absent of said first material.
 2. The hollow molded product of claim 1 wherein the first material has a lower modulus of elasticity than the second material.
 3. The molded product of claim 1 wherein said second material comprises regrind material.
 4. The molded product of claim 1 wherein said first material comprises a thermoplastic elastomer and said second material comprises polyethylene.
 5. The molded product of claim 1 wherein said first material comprises a clear material. 